STRATAHELM · COMMUNITY AI EXPOSURE & RESILIENCE INDEX

Clarke County, Alabama

CAERI National › Alabama › Clarke County · FIPS 01025 · caeri:01025
45.7
CAERI score (national basis)
25th–50th
National percentile band
#2015
Ranked of 3142 U.S. counties
#39
Ranked in Alabama (of 67)
Medium
Confidence

Two comparisons, both shown. The national basis ranks Clarke County against every scored U.S. county — its percentile band above is a relative national standing, not a condition. The in-state basis ranks it against Alabama's other counties (rank and percentile only — bands aren't meaningful within a single state). A county can stand out in its own state while sitting mid-pack nationally. Neither is a forecast.

Pillar breakdown — national percentile ranks

P1 · Direct occupational exposure
12
P2 · Economic concentration
65
P3 · Adaptive capacity (inverted)
32
P4 · Regional buffer (inverted)
64
P5 · Fiscal sensitivity
80
Zone shading marks percentile quartiles; darker and warmer means more concerning. Capacity and buffer bars (inverted before aggregation) read mirrored — for those, a higher percentile is the safer pale end.

What this means for Clarke County

Clarke County scores 45.7 on the national CAERI basis — 2015th of 3,142 scored U.S. counties, placing it in the 25th–50th band nationally by percentile, with a medium-confidence rating. Within Alabama it ranks 39th of 67 counties (43th in-state percentile). The score summarizes how concentrated local employment is in AI-exposed occupations against the economy's measured capacity to adapt; these are relative-standing bands, not a projection of local job change.

Direct occupational exposure stands at the 12th national percentile. The largest concentrations of locally estimated employment in high-exposure occupations are secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal, medical, and executive, customer service representatives, bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks. The share of exposed-industry jobs held by workers under 25 is 7% — below the state median of 8%; research on AI-era payrolls finds early-career roles in exposed work are where hiring patterns shift first, so this share indicates how soon exposure could be felt, not how large it is.

The share of exposed-industry jobs held by workers 55 and over is 29% (above the state median) — a higher share historically means slower workforce adjustment when industries restructure. Fiscal sensitivity ranks at the 48th percentile among Alabama's counties. Census of Governments data shows state aid at 17% of this county's general revenue (well above the state median), and wage- and consumption-sensitive streams (sales, income, and similar own-source taxes, where levied) at 46% of own-source revenue. Property taxes, which respond to economic change more slowly, are counted separately and are not part of that sensitive share. How this state's aid formulas and tax structure carry economic change into local budgets is covered in the state-specific fiscal analysis available to subscribers. All county occupation figures on this page are model-based ESTIMATES with the confidence rating shown above.

Largest locally-estimated employment in high-exposure occupations

Across all 177 high-exposure occupations (top quartile of ensemble exposure) with estimated local employment, Clarke County has an estimated 1,622 jobs — 19.1% of county employment — carrying an estimated $81M annual wage bill in high-exposure work. The five largest:

OccupationEstimated local employment*Exposure (0–1)Median wage (area)
Secretaries and Administrative Assistants, Except Legal, Medical, and Executive2390.50$38,120
Customer Service Representatives980.42$37,300
Bookkeeping, Accounting, and Auditing Clerks920.51$39,650
Medical Secretaries and Administrative Assistants890.57$34,880
First-Line Supervisors of Office and Administrative Support Workers800.47$52,910
*These are estimates, and cannot be anything else. No federal survey measures employment by occupation at county level — not for this county, and not for any county in the United States. Every figure in this table is therefore a model-based ESTIMATE built from published federal data, never a count of actual jobs. They are built to compare occupations and places rather than to be read as headcounts, and their accuracy differs by occupation group — our methodology §5.1 publishes the measured error, including the groups we estimate high and the groups we estimate low. Every county also carries the confidence rating shown above. Wage = area median.

Age structure of exposed-industry employment

Clarke CountyAlabama median
Share of exposed-industry jobs held by workers under 25 (entry rung) 6.9%8.2%
Share of exposed-industry jobs held by workers 55+ (adjustment friction) 28.6%26.5%

🔒 City-level detail for its cities and towns

The county number above averages over every community in it. City- and place-level exposure profiles, employer-mix detail, trend monitoring, and peer benchmarking are part of the CAERI subscription for local governments and regional organizations.

Request city-level access

Cite this page

Canonical identifier: caeri:01025 — this URL is permanent; if the address scheme ever changes, the old address will redirect. StrataHelm. (2026). Clarke County, Alabama — Community AI Exposure & Resilience Index (CAERI v1.0.0) [Data set]. Retrieved October 4, 2026, from https://stratahelm.com/counties/alabama/clarke/ “Clarke County, Alabama — CAERI.” StrataHelm, 2026, stratahelm.com/counties/alabama/clarke/. Accessed 4 October 2026. StrataHelm. “Clarke County, Alabama — Community AI Exposure and Resilience Index (v1.0.0).” 2026. https://stratahelm.com/counties/alabama/clarke/
Embed this county's score card — attribution to StrataHelm CAERI and the link back are part of the embedded page and cannot be stripped:<iframe src="https://stratahelm.com/counties/alabama/clarke/embed/" width="420" height="275" loading="lazy" title="CAERI — Clarke County, AL"></iframe>

Machine-readable: this county's JSON · national dataset download and data dictionary on the methodology page.

Nearby and comparable counties

Coosa County, AL (in state)Covington County, AL (in state)Etowah County, AL (in state)Sanders County, MT (similar score)Harrison County, TX (similar score)Bingham County, ID (similar score)

Links point to the economically nearest counties (in-state, and similar national score). County-level geographic adjacency is not part of the public reference data, so proximity here is by rank, not by shared border.

Sources & provenance

LayerSources (vintage)
Employment & occupation structurecbp_al_county_naics4: Census CBP 2023 API (NAICS2017 classification; PAYANN in $1,000s; noise infusion G/H/J bands, D = withheld -&gt; NaN); county_soc_estimates.meta_al.json; exposure_scores: 2026-10-02; matrix_staffing_patterns: 2024-34 National Employment Matrix (base year 2024)
AI-exposure research baseAnthropic Economic Index; Felten, Raj & Seamans (AIOE); Eloundou et al. — combined as a weighted ensemble with cross-source disagreement feeding the confidence rating
Capacity, buffer & fiscalgovfin_al_county_revenue_mix: 2022 Census of Governments, Survey of Government Finances; lodes_al_county_flows: LEHD LODES8 OD 2023, JT00/S000; sources: al_main, al_aux, fl_aux, ga_aux, ms_aux, tn_aux; qwi_al_county_naics3_age: Census QWI (qwi/sa), quarters [&#x27;2025-Q1&#x27;, &#x27;2025-Q2&#x27;, &#x27;2025-Q3&#x27;, &#x27;2025-Q4&#x27;], sex=0, ownercode=A05 (private), 96 NAICS-3 + &#x27;00&#x27; all-industry
MethodologyCAERI v1.0.0 · public methodology · scores generated 2026-10-02 · page generated 2026-10-04
LicenseFree to reuse under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license: reuse or redistribute with attribution to &ldquo;StrataHelm CAERI&rdquo; and a link back to this page. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/