STRATAHELM · CAERIHomeCountiesArticlesMethodologyContact

Two comparisons, both shown. The national basis ranks Phillips County against every scored U.S. county — its percentile band above is a relative national standing, not a condition. The in-state basis ranks it against Montana's other counties (rank and percentile only — bands aren't meaningful within a single state). A county can stand out in its own state while sitting mid-pack nationally. Neither is a forecast.

Pillar breakdown — national percentile ranks

What this means for Phillips County

Phillips County scores 44.2 on the national CAERI basis — 2191st of 3,142 scored U.S. counties, placing it in the 25th–50th band nationally by percentile, with a low-confidence rating. Within Montana it ranks 37th of 56 counties (35th in-state percentile). The score summarizes how concentrated local employment is in AI-exposed occupations against the economy's measured capacity to adapt; these are relative-standing bands, not a projection of local job change.

Direct occupational exposure stands at the 23rd national percentile. The largest concentrations of locally estimated employment in high-exposure occupations are office clerks, general, bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing clerks, secretaries and administrative assistants, except legal, medical, and executive. The share of exposed-industry jobs held by workers under 25 is 9% — well above the state median of 6%; research on AI-era payrolls finds early-career roles in exposed work are where hiring patterns shift first, so this share indicates how soon exposure could be felt, not how large it is.

The share of exposed-industry jobs held by workers 55 and over is 34% (well above the state median) — a higher share historically means slower workforce adjustment when industries restructure. Fiscal sensitivity ranks at the 39th percentile among Montana's counties. Census of Governments data shows state aid at 25% of this county's general revenue (well above the state median), and wage- and consumption-sensitive streams (sales, income, and similar own-source taxes, where levied) at 0% of own-source revenue. Property taxes, which respond to economic change more slowly, are counted separately and are not part of that sensitive share. How this state's aid formulas and tax structure carry economic change into local budgets is covered in the state-specific fiscal analysis available to subscribers. All county occupation figures on this page are model-based ESTIMATES with the confidence rating shown above.

Largest locally-estimated employment in high-exposure occupations

Across all 116 high-exposure occupations (top quartile of ensemble exposure) with estimated local employment, Phillips County has an estimated 223 jobs — 19.5% of county employment — carrying an estimated $12M annual wage bill in high-exposure work. The five largest:

Age structure of exposed-industry employment

Cite this page

Machine-readable: this county's JSON · national dataset download and data dictionary on the methodology page.

Nearby and comparable counties

Lincoln Co., MT (in state)Daniels Co., MT (in state)Toole Co., MT (in state)Petersburg Co., AK (similar score)Clay Co., AR (similar score)Cumberland Co., TN (similar score)

Links point to the economically nearest counties (in-state, and similar national score). County-level geographic adjacency is not part of the public reference data, so proximity here is by rank, not by shared border.

Sources & provenance